Can't have $70K cars beating $130 or $192K cars, now can, we? I mean, it just wouldn't be proper.
I totally agree with them about the interior, and the suspension issues over bumps, but man, that's a harsh result considering all the performance categories the Z trashes the other two cars in, *including* time around their handling track.
I love that 430, don't get me wrong, but for a $122K price difference, they could have given the Z a little break on its interior. That $122K is, like, enough to buy a cheap house with the money you saved. Or, hell, a 997TT to use as a beater for the bad weather days when you don't wanna drive your higher peformance Chevy
