Quote:
|
This is a dumb question(s) ....but ....how do you like them???
|
Love em
Quote:
|
How are they on the street?
|
Definitely firmer and harsher than stock. But considering I also have VB&P poly bushings and the fact coilovers transmit all noise directly into the frame that's to be expected.
Quote:
|
How much testing did you do with them?
|
I have two track days on them so far. Initial turn-in is quicker. Transient response is MUCH better. The car is flatter through turns and retains a hint of static and dynamic understeer. I was on F1's and could very easily overdrive the tires. I need to test with R compounds to fully exploit them. As you know the front F1's just don't offer enough grip.
No. They're pretty much a bolt on. Not any more difficult that DA Penske's. The remote cannisters and lines are the only thing that need some custom touches. Of course the spring rates and shock pressures are important.
Greg Fordhal of Fordahl Motorsports installed them and setup the car. He's the chief engineer for Alex Job Racing. You might know of him as he won a few SCCA national championships (autoX) in F Prepared I believe. He has a lot of experience with vettes as well and works with some T1 guys. He was telling me about a data aquisition system one T1 car was running and how they can upload suspension and shock data to him for analysis. Pretty interesting.
Oh, I asked him if there was any truth to the C5 shock mounts not being strong enough for coilovers and he said it is definitely not an issue. He's never seen one fail. He said he saw a C4 shock mount fail but that was after a crash but that the C5 mounts are much stronger and no reinforcement is needed.
