Do *I* think it's worth it? No.*
As I said, they are designed (engineered) to run within a nominal temp range for purposes other than performance or even emissions. If on the track the coolant temps are TOO HOT, then chances are the car itself is being operated outside of its design intentions.
How hot is too hot? How long can you run at that temp before something untoward occurs? Will it happen on the track, or six months later on 405?
You've probably seen posts like "
I was only doing 35 mph when the engine seized." Yeah, perhaps, but how many times prior to that was it taken to redline or even the rev limiter? Then again, maybe it just failed and the guy drove like grandma, but we'll never know.
*I've done about every mod to a C5 Z06 that one can do. My C6 Z? I'm leaving it alone because, IMO...it isn't worth it.
That's a separate debate. Seriously, if the car is SO GOOD stock, then why do people feel they have to mod the hell out of 'em? Don't answer, I know the reason. But seriously, if you have to "improve it", then it must not have been adequate to begin with. How many people mod Enzo's? Not very many!
One of the best cars in the world. Yet some think they can improve it. Well, then it must not have been good enough.
Pretzel logic.
I never claim it's the best. I only improved or changed its shortcomings, and there were plenty. Thus, it wasn't as good as some think. Was it worth it? Nope. Never has been. Never will be. But we still do it.